Friday, October 7, 2011

BTW: THE STREETS ARE FILLED WITH COMMUNIST PROTESTORS!!

I don't know if you've heard, but there is a communist uprising in the streets of America:

New York, Washington DC, Miami, Boston, Providence, Chicago, Denver, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Seattle, “...the movement has spread to at least 147 cities in the U.S. and 28 overseas.”¹ They are called “Anti-Wall Street Protests” but they are nothing less than a communist uprising in the streets of America. All you have to do is look at their signs or listen to their rhetoric calling for an “End to Capitalism” and a “New Economic System.” They are now putting less effort than ever into disguising their true nature. In other words, the masks are coming off!

Personally, I live in a small town far removed from the city lights and I bet 9 out of 10 people around here haven't even heard about this. I watch FOX News, so I at least get the watered down version of the story.

Everybody thinks FOX News is some kind of front organization for the Tea Party or something. Truth is, FOX News is closer to the other end of the spectrum than they'd like you to believe. Listening to the bemused commentary on these “Anti-Wall Street Protests” you'd think they're no more sinister than a Cub Scout Jamboree.

The response is a little different overseas: From the publication In Defense of Marxism in London: USA: Wall Street rocked by anti-capitalist protests – time to build a labor party!:
“At least 39 unions and community organizations joined Wednesday's march in New York, including groups like MoveOn.org and the Coalition of the Homeless. But by far and away the most powerful were the unions: the United Federation of Teachers, the Communication Workers of America, the United Auto Workers, the United Healthcare Workers, the Public Employees Union DC37, and many others.”³ You can throw in: the Obama administration, George Soros, Michael Moore, Susan Sarandon, Jessie Jackson, Acorn, SEIU, and the Teamsters...kind of like a Who's Who of the far left. Like Andy Stern, the head of the SEIU, said in June of 2007 during a television interview, "'Workers of the world unite' isn't just a slogan anymore, it's a way we're going to have to do our work."

Predators and disease always attack the weakest first. Communism infects our children, our poor, the mentally ill, the politicians and the artists in our society like a disease. Communism intends to leverage that influence into an authoritarian and oppressive “new economic system” where bureaucrats replace free-market forces as the final arbiters of success and failure. They infect and cripple the capitalist system with progressive programs and regulations and then claim that capitalism has failed because it is a flawed system. They complain about the corruption of capitalism and in the next breath propose a system that has corruption as its foundation. Just ask anybody who has ever had a business in a communist country, you cannot do one thing without paying off some public official. They are partners in every aspect of your business forever, contributing nothing but protection from the destructive power of the state.

Like Satan himself, Communism cloaks itself in harmless looking disguises so as to trick its way into the hearts and minds of the weakest and most gullible among us. Make no mistake, Communism desires nothing more than to completely separate us from God and send us all to straight to Hell. We ignore these "protests" at our peril.

“Marx's call to eliminate the next world by establishing a utopia on this one was taken up with a vengeance by Lenin and a host of communist leaders who followed him. These despots established atheism as state doctrine in the Soviet Union and other Marxist regimes around the world. In the last hundred years these regimes, led by people like Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, Nicolae Ceausescu, Enver Hoxha, Fidel Castro, Kim Jong-11, and others, have murdered more than 100 million people. Even Bin Laden, in his wildest dreams, doesn't come close.”²

More than 100 million people! More than the Civil War, both World Wars, the Korean War and Vietnam combined! Try to get your head around that!

Communism has robbed many more of the hope, dignity and freedom that true capitalism, not only affords, but requires. Instead of delivering on its promise to deliver Social Justice and enrich the poor, every time communism is tried, it leaves everybody, except a few of the ruling elite, worse off than before.

The nature of communism is the nature of evil. It seeks to trick us into believing that we are like gods and that we can control everything that affects us, that we can create a godless utopia on earth. As with the abandonment of faith for atheism, only disaster and despair await those fools who abandon capitalism for the false promise of communism..

But, hey, it's just a bunch of innocent kids expressing themselves. Isn't that cute. (sarcasm)

"A man who rides on the back of a tiger will find it very difficult when he tries to dismount.”³

1) Esmé E. Deprez and Alison Vekshin "Anti-Wall Street Protesters March From NYC to San Francisco" October 06, 2011 Bloomberg Businessweek

2) Dinesh D'Souza. Life After Death: The Evidence (pp. 188-189). Kindle Edition.

3) Alan Woods Thursday, 06 October 2011 In Defense of Marxism, marxism.com

TSA Saves Us Again (sarcasm):

Police Question Saudi Man Accused of Attempt to Break Into Plane's Cockpit

Abdulaziz Mubarak Alshammari, a 20 year old Saudi citizen who had just arrived in this country, attempted to enter the cockpit of an American Airlines flight en route from New York to Indianapolis yesterday. Even though Abdulaziz's story about being a student at the University of Indianapolis turned out to be false, no charges were filed and he was almost immediately released. Apparently a check of watch-lists failed to turn up his name.

Remember these two incidents from May 8th of this year that TSA also failed to prevent?

2 unruly passengers held on Chicago-related flights - 1 tried to open plane's door in midair, other rushed cockpit

What do all three of these incidents have in common? No, they weren't all Saudi citizens. One was from Yemen and one was "from" Burbank. I put "from" in quotes because the Yemen citizen was listed as being "from" Vallejo, Ca. So, I can't say for sure that all three weren't foreign born. In all three incidents though, it was not some TSA agent or even an air marshal that subdued the potential terrorist. No, it was freshly groped U.S. citizens who saved the day in each and every instance.

Read more: http://www.fox43.com/news/nationworld/chibrknews-flight-passenger-tries-to-open-door-plane-diverted-20110508,0,1099302.story

Wednesday, October 5, 2011

Amanda Knox: Cat Killer

I've been asking people around here what they thought of this story. The response was unanimous, Amanda Knox was innocent! But, I wasn't so sure. So, I decided to take a closer look at the Amanda Knox story.

In the first article that I pulled up, I found out a cat got killed too!! "There was blood on a wall in the downstairs apartment, determined to be that of a black cat.” Wow, never heard that in the mainstream news reports. I found that on a pro-Knox site, by the way.

That same article points out that there are 24 Masonic Lodges in Perugia Italy, the town where this murder took place. It is a well known fact in Italy that some Satanic-Masonic rituals include removing one shoe and leaving feces behind (sorry) and are generally performed on Thursdays. The crime scene had bloody left shoe prints and one bloody bare right foot print, and “there were un-flushed feces in the toilet (sorry again), and there was blood on a wall in the downstairs apartment, determined to be that of a black cat.” 1 Also, this crime was committed, not just on a Thursday, but on the Thursday immediately following Halloween, a day of special significance to Satanic-Masonics.

All of that is interesting and gross, but it doesn't really speak to the guilt or innocence of Amanda Knox. What it does do is explain why the press in this country was so quick to run to the defense of Knox and how she was able to effectively discredit the prosecution and police.

Apparently, Italy has something in its history similar to the Salem witch trials about which Italians are still very sensitive and defensive. The chief prosecutor, therefore, was advised not to mention anything about the Masonic witchcraft thing, however, he talked about the possibility of a ritualistic “game” anyway. This played right into the hands of the defense by incurring the self-righteous disdain of the all-seeing press. There is nothing the press loves more than the opportunity to oppose a “witch-hunt,” all the better if the defendant really is a witch.

After the cat blood, the next thing to catch my attention was the absence of any sympathy for the victim or the victim's family in any of Knox's comments. Yes, she mentioned the victim, but only incidentally as she cried about how traumatic the whole thing was to her, “She was killed in our house, and if I was there that night I could have been killed,” and "I've lost a friend in the worst, most brutal, most inexplicable way possible, I'm paying with my life for things that I didn't do." She talked about her and the victim being friends in a carefully worded way so as to remove questions about motive. Everything was about how Knox suffered and worded to imply that Knox didn't do it. I did not see any comments by Amanda Knox that were pure expressions of concern or sympathy for the victim or the victim's family.

Speaking of the victim's family, THEY think that Knox is GUILTY: “The victim' family had pressed for the court to uphold the guilty verdicts passed two years ago, and resisted theories that a third man convicted in the case.., had acted alone”2 ...and so do a lot of the residents of Perugia, Italy: “At 5pm , armed with a new passport, Knox and her family walked out of the jailhouse and into the street -- to a mob chanting, 'Murderers!' and 'Shame!"3

Also, the way she went about claiming that she was innocent didn't sound quite right to me. “I am not what they say I am. I am not perverse, violent, disrespectful toward life (or) people -- these things do not apply to me, and I have not done the things that have been suggested,’’ said Knox What about, "I didn't do it! ?" Maybe it was in there somewhere but, you know what, if I had been falsely accused of slashing someone's throat, I'd be saying “I didn't do it!” every other sentence. I wouldn't be going on about how I was a good person. Who cares if I'm a good person or not? And what about the other accusations that, even if she didn't slash the victim's throat herself, she was involved in the murder or, at least, knew more than she was saying? So, what about, “I didn't have anything to do with it and I don't know anything about it?” That's what an innocent person who hadn't even been in her apartment on the night of the murder would have said. I sure didn't hear anything like that.

Now, about the facts of the case: Following is a quote from Amanda Knox to police about the night of the crime:

"...I went into another room and then I heard screams. ... Patrick and Meredith (the victim) were in Meredith's bedroom while I think I stayed in the kitchen. ... I can't remember how long they were together in the bedroom, but the only thing I can say is that at a certain point I remember hearing Meredith's screams and I covered my ears. ... I can't remember if Meredith was screaming and if I heard thuds but I could imagine what was going on."

Based on Amanda Knox's statement, "Patrick Lumumba, 38, ...spent two weeks in prison before being able to prove that he spent the night of the murder talking to a customer in his pub...."4 Amanda Knox remained silent while Lumuba sat in jail for two weeks.

So, Amanda Knox initially said that she was in the apartment and that Patrick did it. It later turned out that Patrick had an airtight alibi. Again, she remained silent for two weeks while Patrick sat in jail.

Amanda Knox eventually settled on the story that she was never in her apartment that night and that she spent the night with her boyfriend, getting up around 10:30am. She says that they downloaded and watched cartoons and a movie. “But computer experts told the court that there was no activity on his laptop between 9.10pm on Nov 1, and 5.32am the next morning — the time frame in which the murder took place.”4 Anyway, “Records on her cellphone indicated she was elsewhere, and she was caught on a closed-circuit security camera entering her own apartment that night.”6

What I find even more suspicious is the fact that Amanda Knox and her boyfriend both turned their cell phones off right before the time of the murder: “Knox and her boyfriend turned off their mobile phones on the night of the murder, from around 8.40pm, and turned them back on at around 6am. The victim left a friend's home after eating pizza and watching The Notebook on DVD...She arrived home shortly before 9pm. At 8:56, she called her mother but her call was never completed.”5

Then there was the staged break-in: Knox & her boyfriend called police to report a burglary the morning after the murder. When police arrived they found a broken window and a room that appeared to have been burglarized with clothes and personal belongings dumped all over the floor consistent with a burglary. Problem was, the broken glass was on top of the items that were on the floor indicating that the window was broken after the items were dumped onto the floor. The bigger problem was that most of the glass was outside rather than inside, consistent with the window being broken from the inside. Also, no hair, no fibers, no blood, no DNA on the jagged alleged entry point.

“It is especially telling that when Knox's boyfriend called the police to report the "burglary" in two separate, recorded phone calls, he said nothing had been stolen -- despite the fact that (the other roommate who's room it was) had not yet come home. The only way (the boyfriend) would know nothing was stolen was if he had helped stage the burglary himself.”7

There were also inconsistencies and suspicious behavior associated with how Knox and her boyfriend behaved when the police came to investigate the staged break-in. Knox's boyfriend tried to break through the victim's door prior to the arrival of the police but then, once the police arrived, he & Knox played down the issue of the locked door saying that the victim always kept her door locked. Then the third roommate showed up and told police that the victim never locked her door. Not, “didn't always lock her door” but “never locked her door,” whereupon the police immediately broke the door down and discovered the body.

But, here's what finally made me conclude that Amanda Knox is guilty:

“The owner of a supermarket, said Miss Knox had been in his (store) at 7.45 the morning (that Knox's roommate's) body was found. (The store owner) told the court he had seen her in the cleaning section of his...store just hours before (the body) was discovered...Police who searched (Knox's boyfriend's) house...days after the murder found a receipt for (bleach) from the shop where Miss Knox was allegedly seen. “8

This tells me two things: Amanda Knox was lying about the details of the night in question (but we already knew that) and she was cleaning something.

I found it telling, not to mention deliciously ironic, that Knox actually remarked about how naturally sloppy she was during her acquittal remarks. A 20 year old who is naturally sloppy doesn't usually show up at a grocery store at 7:45am to buy cleaning products. And, what are the odds, that, if she did, it would just happen to be on the very morning that her roommate is found dead? And then “Police found Amanda’s prints in one place only, on a water glass in the kitchen.” 1

That means that somebody must have recently scrubbed every inch of that apartment!

The victim's mother said, after the trial, “...we do not understand how the decision of the first trial could be so radically overturned,” “Radically” because the DNA evidence, on which the acqittal was based, was just one part of the evidence against Amanda Knox. There remains a very clear picture of an obviously guilty individual getting away with murder

Saturday, October 1, 2011

Police arresting people for video-taping them

Following is a comment I posted in response to an article by Jacob Sullum on The Patriot Post that appeared in The Evening Sun today under the title "Shielding officials from scrutiny" (click on this link to read the article on which I am commenting):

We ignore this at our peril. When the Nazis began rounding up and executing Jews, they made it a crime to watch. If our government succeeds in preventing us from being able to “watch” them, it will inevitably lead to increased misconduct, atrocities, and the loss of freedom. Also, if I am unable to record incoming phone calls to my home, then my ability to defend myself and my family against all sorts of threats is greatly compromised. The requirement that I must obtain the permission of people who are calling to threaten, harass, scam, or molest me or my children prior to my being able to legally record them is absurd. Are the police going to set up a wire-tap sting operation at my house to protect me from these type of threats? I don't think so.

And in further news...

Popular Posts